pr raoult sur you tube

100% wrong. HCQ does work. That way, if the other side tries to point out the flaw in your candidate, voters just roll their eyes. Not a fan of Raoult at all but it is unfair to compare the mortality rate in his studies to the estimated infection fatality rate (0.53%) as the latter is necessarily much lower. Why not chemical castration (to escape COVID-19)? Vladimir Poutine s'autorise à faire deux mandats de plus, Contrôle Covid à Marseille : "La pinte la plus chère de tous les temps", Une Marseillaise nous fera entrer chez Gainsbourg. And while we’re at it, the author doesn’t seem to understand that chloroquine is not the same as HCQ. Eh? To make the insolence worse, Raoult’s approach was repeatedly criticised by Bik. Bulletin d'informations scientifiques - Nous avons le droit d'être intelligents ! Costa Rica is using it using Wuhan methodology, you can check it out…what’s wrong with you, writing piles of shit? Raoult is right. The French newspaper Entreprendre cited his letter to Robert Lafont, the CEO of this publishing house. If your candidate has an obvious flaw – corruption or cowardice or multiple mistresses – you get in first and launch advertisements claiming accusing your opponent of immorality or cowardice or whatever. Pr. Unlike his own clinical trials, Mahevas et al was really an observational study of 181 French COVID-19 patients treated after Raoult’s method, but with a control group. The online article was swiftly deleted, but here is a backup. I was indeed recruited as Professor by the Peking University (PUHSC), the most renowned medical school in the country, which happens to be very advanced in the field of virology. The next day, the authors returned a revised version which was immediately accepted. I’d just like to see a cure found. Even more schizophrenically: all studies which Raoult designed in advance, with the explicit purpose to prove his therapy, were declared “retrospective” to deny the need for an ethics approval. This medicin is approved for people with lupus and reuma. It’s illegal : cf https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&idArticle=LEGIARTI000025457542. This article has been updated several times since it was first published. The media and AMA doesn’t seem to want you to hear about it. Avec une confirmation cette fois qu'aucun consentement n'a été demandé. Apparently no difference but this is all we have and doesn't fit to inclusion criteria. Only that the Wuhan authors never mention azythromycine, while Raoult so far insisted HCQ does not help critically ill COVID-19 patients at all. And it shortens the viral cycle by a lot more than 3 days (Remdesivir). 7 were here. Independent Science Journalist and Cartoonist. And what now? If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Didier RAOULT, l'IHU est un pôle mondial dans le domaine des maladies infectieuses 1€ ISAC (and then the publisher Elsevier) insist however that the peer review process “did adhere to the industry’s peer review rules.” Which is strange, since it seems the paper was reviewed and sent back for minor revision on the same day it was submitted. Do check the references here. Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected, you can see where this is going. Raoult was possibly made to resign his job, he was cited to go to China already this summer. Parmi les gens confinés, il y a de très bons mathématiciens, de très bons statisticiens." About Dr Barraud alias fluidloading (which never denied to be Dr Barraud), here is most of his attacks on Pr Raoult, look at this link, http://www.noelshack.com/2020-17-3-1587558555-r-barraud.png. The first author of the new Gautret et al TMID 2020, Philippe Gautret, is incidentally associate editor of that of that journal. However you don’t address the flawed Veterans study that Raoult criticizes, which is way worse than his studies on all points. Once again minors cannot be included in a study unless they cannot be replaced by adults. Mais ce mardi, il semblerait que sa vidéo habituelle ait rencontré un problème sur la plateforme américaine. I took it. You have many valid points against Raoult methodologies, although the urgency of the situation excuses some of it. We as doctors need to think about how things work and why they work. I cannot agree more. Please either reference the law that was broken and explain how (which would be really valuable info), or delete that line. just published a couple of days ago. Maybe he will replace azythromycine with TCM now? IHU’s human guinea pigs were unaware of the experimental nature of the therapy, quite the opposite: because Raoult decreed that the hydroxychloroquine+azithromycine method must work, he retrospectively defined it a “standard treatment“. Bik blogged about that Brazilian “study”, where 636 patients, distance-assessed by telemedicine only, themselves decided which drug to take after they self-diagnosed themselves with COVID-19 (sic!). Unfortunately a (supposed) lie can’t be fought with another lie, but with the truth. “He even treated 14 year old children with chloroquine as part of his 1000 patients trial (Table 1 here, recruitment age was >12 years old), which is actually quite illegal.”. Regarding the Mahevas study in Medrxiv. You undermine your credibility with your extreme polemic personal attacks. It is all very surreal. Connectez-vous pour réagir à cet article. The treatment costs nothing and this is what is annoying them all!!!! https://t.co/j6XIANLKHz pic.twitter.com/K0hFEHserc. Regardless of the obviously repeatedly rigged peer review process, that wretched first Gautret et al IJAA 2020 paper serves as the ONLY clinical study on which the pharma giant Novartis bases its newly announced phase 3 clinical trial in USA, on 440 patients. If somebody has a hint that something might be working based on observation, then it should be presented that way. After dealing with Bik, Raoult tweeted his criticism about a study by his French colleagues in Paris and their study Mahevas et al medRxiv 2020. When Raoult claimed to have cured 80 patients of COVID-19, without a control arm in his study, Bik summed up: Notre étude porte sur 80 patients, sans groupe contrôle car nous proposons notre protocole à tous les patients ne présentant pas de contre-indication.C'est ce que nous dicte le serment d'Hippocrate que nous avons prêté. The retrospective controlled clinical study found out that hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had a high risk of death and concluded: “In this study, we found no evidence that use of hydroxychloroquine, either with or without azithromycin, reduced the risk of mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. la diffusion, alors qu'elle sait cette information inexacte, est puni d'une peine d'un an d'emprisonnement et de 15 000 euros d'amende. You seem to be a great analyst. Put the PNG version through level sweep analysis, and it shows blocky halos around pasted-in elements, including text, bands and lanes. Le professeur marseillais, Didier Raoult intervenait ce matin sur Cnews. Like these copy-pasted disease-spreading ticks, or these copy-pasted fraud-spreading gel bands, newly discovered at IHU: P Renesto, P Dehoux, E Gouin, L Touqui, P Cossart, D Raoult Identification and Characterization of a Phospholipase D–Superfamily Gene in Rickettsiae J Infect Dis (2003) doi: 10.1086/379080 Also “lanes two and three show concerning similarities.“. Seen from France he was a visionary that refuse this stupid general confinement and that very early asker fot the TTT’s way of the South Korea. The “great scientist” believes in his delirium to be actually just like a World War I general, commanding thousands of men to get out the trenches and die for the glory of France. the “Oh no, don’t test my child with PCR, let him die of unknown reason” is not what a decent parent is going to say. Raoult treats patients who come to IHU-Marseille, therefore statistically more motivated by symptoms than in the Pasteur survey. Not the one done by his US peers in the Veterans Affairs hospitals, that was a “fraudulent” and “fake news”. Period. In many countries, the mortality rate is >10%, This is lethality and not mortality, so learn first and talk later. To be updated, proper randomized controlled clinical trials on chloroquine against COVID-19 are ongoing and might soon deliver results. Pr Perronne, auteur de “Il y a t-il une erreur qu’ILS n’ont pas commise” au micro d'André Bercoff sur Sud Radio Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. Pr Raoult is such a visionary that is predictions where false : 21/01/2020 : “Coronavirus in China: should we feel concerned?” “The world has gone crazy, 3 Chinese people die and it make a worldwide alert” ” (https://youtu.be/qoBoryHuZ6E) https://t.co/6f8e1tXNns https://t.co/Y91bsFOgB2. I can’t insert graphics here. Pingback: De linke weekendbijlage (17-2020) - Kloptdatwel? Avec "La Provence" ce mardi : métiers d'art, un patrimoine toujours vivant ! Is the inventor of chloroquine cure for COVID-19, the French microbiologist Didier Raoult, sane? P.S. Nobody nowadays can ignore the role of media. He just healed patients that were showing up at his hospital, he wasn’t in a clinical trial and never was. Dear Owlbert, please share your visual analysis! https://t.co/zI8MgsfHlx. This was Raoult’s letter, translated: “Since you have been one of the rare journalists to have exhibited exemplary behaviour during this period, I would like to take this opportunity to reserve for you the first news: my upcoming departure for China (by the end of the summer). President’s Award for Outstanding Creative Activity, The Monsanto Papers: a wrong book on glyphosate, Towards equal opportunity for prostate, breast and ovarian cancers, Didier Raoult fraud: "Je ne regrette rien", Paolo Macchiarini indicted for aggravated assault in Sweden, Chloroquine genius Didier Raoult to save the world from COVID-19. This guy has been trolling science for years. Didier Raoult a réagi sur Twitter aujourd’hui, jeudi 10 septembre, déclarant : « Mon bulletin scientifique de mardi a été censuré par Youtube, décision confirmée après appel. Newspapers were quick to denounce the report as fake news and a prank, Lafort himself played stupid, but I personally am not so sure (although it is likely Raoult was never offered a job in Peking). But now Raoult seems to have gone completely off the rails. OK we somehow face the unknown, but it’s not like we have no approach to deal with urgent situations, no knowledge gained from past pandemics and nobody except Raoult working on it. When the time comes to discuss research financing, what will the taxpayers remember of that story? It became very complicated to undertake research projects in the health sector in France, the sector being plagued by partisan quarrels, sprawling bureaucracy and political correctness. Raoult’s follow up clinical trial with 80 patients treated with chloroquine and azithromycine and without any control arm (criticised by Bik above) was published in a different Elsevier journal, and accepted the next day after submission. Raoult says this is good science. WTF?? So continue your “better science” while they save people. Moreover, could they inform the public about the clinical outcome of these patients? And anyway, Raoult and his colleagues “deemed it ethically unacceptable to conduct a therapeutic trial“. Didier Raoult (French pronunciation: [didje ʁaul(t)]; born 13 March 1952) is a French physician and microbiologist specialising in infectious diseases. That’s magic ! In Morocco and South Korea the same protocol has proven extremely efficient with lowest mortality rates in the world. In 1 day. He writes : "I declare no competing interests. South Dakota? La méthodologie n’est pas de la science, c’est un outil de la science, cela n’a rien avoir (ce n’est pas la même chose). It is only available as document on the file sharing platform Dropbox (sic! Sorry, it works, I am living proof. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1u7bETd3q9QVfO6y54jm_7Z5ZHTmoguUAetJHc2gwcj0/edit?usp=sharing. Again 🚩🚩🚨 pic.twitter.com/tIg2JNycRB. Zelenko is a fraud, but he seems to have shut up and left the scene when people started asking awkward questions about the current conditions of his clients and whether he was bothering to keep tabs on them.There were also legal issues about his rash decision to release a non-anonymised spreadsheet that identified his clients. After that, let’s look at Bahrain, and Turkey. The idea is to kill the virus. T, you mentioned the fatality rate in France is 0.53%? This is not a surprise, based on experience from SARS-Cov, MERS-Cov and seasonal influenza virus. If you treat shingles after 48 hours Valcyclovir is not effective. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Moreover, could they inform the public about the clinical outcome of these patients? It cannot be “quite illegal”. De linke weekendbijlage (17-2020) - Kloptdatwel? Fake news. Raoult (or maybe his personal assistant in charge of social media) tweeted his views: “The witchhunter @MicrobiomDigest is not attentive to details when she judges that a study is useful to her paranoiac fights!Control group was treated with azithromycin.Nearly dying patients with lymphopenia were treated with hydroxychloroquine.Fraudulent study. We do have laws in France, and they respected it. Scientists generally understand that and it is acceptable in urgent situations. Vous avez trouvé sur notre site internet un contenu ou un message manifestement illicite et/ou portant atteinte à la dignité humaine ? In this double-blinded phase IIb clinical trial, all patients were treated just as Raoult says, with hydroxychloroquine+azithromycine only, without those evil controls Raoult hates? source : https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Hydroxychloroquine_final_DOI_IJAA.pdf On 14 April 2020, Raoult’s IHU Marseille openly and publicly threatened a clinician Damien Barraud, who has been very critical of their chloroquine “studies” on Twitter and in newspaper interviews. The last two strongly suggest that there is a kind of religious mass psychosis going on at IHU. You misunderstand “study” and “clinical trial”. Dirigé par le Pr. Enter your email address to follow For Better Science and receive notifications of new posts by email. Ok, you don’t like the guy..you don’t like Trump…but it’s working, doctors have started using it and this pile of excrement you have written here will be forgoten and so will you! At the moment we don’t have any treatment that is efficient for covid-19. You are attempting to compare the implied infection fatality rate of France to the case fatality rate of a hospital. A retrospective study on 84 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine and azithromycine from New York University (Chorin et al medRxiv 2020) also demonstrated how serious those side effects in COVID-19 patients can be: “We report the change in the QT interval in 84 adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with Hydroxychloroquine/Azithromycin combination. HCQ works like Tamiflu for the flu. Not just this. You want to use it as early as possible, so it has a better chance of killing fewer bad guys to be successful. I don’t think there is any such place. Problem is, having cemented his totalitarian power at IHU, having stifled all dissent years ago and having surrounded himself by loyal yes-sayers only, there is nobody to tell Raoult that he is making an utter arse of himself, in public and even on video. Can you deny this man is so hated that students who do not have a carrier yet are not afraid to go public on what it means to work in his institute? It is a herbal TCM concoction, the trial had 4 arms with 3 different Shuanghuanglian quantity, plus control arm. Both withdrew in 2018, after Raoult proved a despotic tyrant who allowed sexual harassment, discrimination and bullying to happen in his institute (read more here). These patients take HCQ on a daily basis. Donc, c’est pas vrai, c’est de l’intox, c’est pas vrai et ça disparaîtra comme c’est apparu il y a une vingtaine d’année, c’est de l’intox, je vous suggère d’ailleurs plutôt que… vous avez qu’à le lire car c’est intelligent, sur la version de wikipedia en anglais, vous avez qu’à lire, vous verrez qu’il y a la moité qui dit “voilà il faut faire des essais randomisés” et l’autre moitié qui dit “voilà pourquoi il ne faut pas en faire” et vous verrez que je ne suis pas isolé dans ce monde et que d’ailleurs tous les gens qui ont critiqués ça, je le redit, d’ailleurs et il faut le lire et il faut écouter ce que je dit, tous les gens qui ont critiqué ça n’ont publié que des essais comparatifs non randomisés, il n’y a pas un essai français randomisé comparatif, il n’y a pas même un essai français qui ait le degrée d’isolement des stratégies thérapeutique comme le notre, zéro. Waiting to use it until the patient is deathly ill is an exercise in futility. Repeated nasopharyngeal swabs in 10 patients (not done in the patient who died) using a qualitative PCR assay (nucleic acid extraction using Nuclisens Easy Mag®, Biomerieux and amplification with RealStar SARS CoV-2®, Altona), were still positive for SARS-CoV2 RNA in 8/10 patients (80%, 95% confidence interval: 49–94) at days 5 to 6 after treatment initiation.“. In 14 patients with paired samples, respiratory secretion at day 4 was negative in only one patient.”. Your email address will not be published. This could be figured out by looking at the disclosed study days in the preprint and the trial registration at the Clinical Trials website.“. Will be better for all of us dear Mr.Nobody. Maybe this is because the only clinical data supporting the malaria drug chloroquine cure against coronavirus comes from Raoult himself. Now, the preprint by the Tongji cardiologist Wang Daowen and colleagues claims all 568 patients received “baseline treatments [..] of antiviral drugs (Lopinavir and Ritonavir, Entecavir hydrate, or Ribavirin)“. Heavy use of HCQ. 0,4% death rate. Control group was treated with azithromycin.Nearly dying patients with lymphopenia were treated with hydroxychloroquine.Fraudulent study. Within 5 days, one patient died, two were transferred to the ICU. On 24 April Raoult and his IHU issued another press release or a white paper, where they openly accused their Paris colleagues Mahevas et al of “scientific fraud“, already in the headline. Nobody at Marseille laughed or told Raoult to check himself in into an asylum. Please try to explain it away…but it sounds like a darn good prophylaxis. I think it’s better to focus on the serious flaws of Rauolt’s ‘studies.’ And if we want to talk about undermining credibility with extreme polemic personal attacks, we should look at what Raoult is doing and has done for years against detractors. Go read the paper that claims HCQ leads to higher death rate. In 11% of patients QTc increased to >500 ms, representing high risk group for arrhythmia. Seen from France on April, 25, there does not seem to be an HQ miracle. What do they have in common? Citizens For Responsible Care and Research (CIRCARE), Follow For Better Science on WordPress.com. PARIS — Sitting behind his desk in a hospital in the southern French city of Marseille, Didier Raoult has convinced thousands, including the U.S. president, that a common antimalarial drug can save people infected by the coronavirus.. Implying that Mahevas et al played fast-and-loose when assigning cases to groups (and complaining about lack of clarity in clinical outcomes) is especially rich and reaches Trumpian levels of hypocrisy. That’s the difference here. Here is proof of a study one in Spain given HCQ early on. Only one molecule difference, but vastly different properties.
pr raoult sur you tube 2021