The Soviet state was perceived by the people as the construction of the "New Empire", the "kingdom of the world", the "monastery of spirit", and not as the creation of the most rational device for administering and managing quantitative units. Find books like Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia: English Translation from the world’s largest community of readers. All Russian attempts to enter the Mediterranean Sea through the Bosphorus and Dardanelles were a desire for complicity in the political organization of the coastal regions of Eurasia, where the British reigned supreme, easily suppressing any attempts of Russian expansion through control of this coastal zone. To fill the religious-monarchist formula with truly sacred content, lost under the influence of the secular West on the Romanov dynasty, to carry out the Orthodox “conservative revolution” in order to return to the roots of a true Christian worldview; To transform the term "nationality" from the Uvarov formula into the central aspect of the socio-political structure, make the People the main, fundamental political and legal category, contrast the organic concept of the People with quantitative norms of liberal and socialist jurisprudence, develop the theory of "people's rights"; Instead of Slavophile geopolitics, turn to Eurasian projects that reject the anti-German policies of Russia in the West and anti-Japanese policies in the East, to end the Atlantic line disguised as “Russian nationalism”; Impede the processes of privatization and capitalization, as well as the stock market game and financial speculation in the Empire, focus on corporate, collective and state control of the people over economic reality, and discard the dubious chimera of "national capitalism"; Instead of the gubernial principle, proceed to the creation of ethno-religious areas with the maximum degree of cultural, linguistic, economic, and legal autonomy, strictly restricting them to one thing in political, strategic, geopolitical, and ideological sovereignty. At the same time, the solid axis of Moscow Tehran will remove all the contradictions between Russophilism and Islamism (Iranian type), make them the same geopolitical tendency, oriented both to Moscow and Tehran at the same time. The responsibility for this lies not only with the "agents of influence" and "anti-Soviet", but, first of all, with the central Soviet ideologists of both the "progressive" and the "conservative" wing. after the creation of the Moscow Berlin axis, this function should be delegated to Berlin and Europe as a whole. Therefore, the eastern borders of Eurasia for this Empire have the same strategic significance as the problems of the West. are considered regional powers. On the other hand, there is the problem of the former Soviet Central Asia, where three geopolitical tendencies “pan-Turkism” (Turkey, Atlantism), “Wahhabism” (Saudi Arabia, Atlantism) and “fundamentalism” (Iran, anti-Atlanticism) compete today. Partly the same line inspired Mitterrand's Franco-German projects. Otherwise, an appeal to historical conflicts, misunderstandings and disputes will frustrate any attempt to create a solid and reliable base of the vital Moscow-Berlin axis. And in the long run, this will lead to the formation of a solid strategic and economic structure for the creation of the entire Eurasian Empire of the European Empire in the West and the Russian Empire in the East of Eurasia. The only universal integrating reality in the future Eurasian Empire will be a categorical imperative strategic alliance , i.e. such a geopolitical alliance that will allow in all strategic directions to effectively resist the Atlantic influences, American geopolitical pressure and political and economic dictatorship. A confederate principle will also operate within these secondary Empires, but this will apply to smaller ethnic, national and regional units to what, with greater or lesser approximation, can be called a "country" or "state". It was on the basis of such an urgent need of the West of Russia that the role of a ", First, at the ideological level for the entire existence of the socialist regime, purely national, traditional, spiritual elements have not been introduced into the general complex of communist ideology. political democratization allowed China to become dependent on Western financial groups without conflict, while maintaining a totalitarian system and the appearance of political independence. Updated 17th April 2020. By the way, representatives of "small nationalism" of all peoples will quite consciously make such a substitution, reproaching the Eurasians and continental imperial builders for wanting to dissolve their ethnic groups, religions, cultures, etc. For example, the current unification of Europe under American, NATO control will very soon make it feel its geopolitical and economic contradictions, and therefore, it will inevitably be frustrated, or suspended, or spontaneously acquire the unexpected, anti-American (and potentially Eurasian) dimension that was foreseen by Jean Tiriar. The degree of integration of the Empires themselves will also be a variable, depending on the specific ideological base on which this or that Empire will be created. The same, if not worse, threatens Russia, and most likely attempts to gain a foothold as a "regional power", abandoning the civilizational mission and universalist values, will bring to life the politicians of the "Young" type (similar to the Young Turks), which are very likely will profess a special sectarian ideology that has nothing to do with the main line of the Russian national idea. These include Alfred Mahan and Halford Mackinder. Moreover, in the current conditions it is difficult to expect from Europe a genuine geopolitical and national awakening without the revolutionary influence of the Russian factor. 35 – 36 ch. However, in parallel with the strengthening of the role of the United States and their seizure of almost complete control over the English colonies, the strategic role of England has significantly decreased, and today in Europe this country acts more as an extraterritorial floating base of the United States than as an independent force. Have either maritime borders or friendly blocs on adjacent continental territories; To have a flexible and differentiated ethno-religious structure of the internal political and administrative structure, i.e. The New Empire should have a clear strategy regarding its eastern component. It is clear that among the “non-Moskovo” trends, the New Empire can rely only on the pro-Iranian orientation, which will bring this region out of direct or indirect control of the Atlantists. Furthermore, any purely inertial conservatism in this matter can only worsen the situation. , and that the Atlantic empire of the West will weaken, and possibly destroy, it completely. Central Europe alone does not have sufficient political and military potential to gain true independence from US Atlantic control. The integration of Europe under the auspices of Germany as the basis of such a European Empire fits perfectly into the Eurasian project and is the most desirable process for a more global continental integration. Alexander Dugin developed his own geostrategy which he laid out in The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia (1997). Geopolitical journals and institutes have multiplied, … From the point of view of geopolitical constants, Iran, of course, has a priority in this matter, since it satisfies all Eurasian parameters, it is a major continental power closely connected with Central Asia, radically anti-American, traditionalist and emphasizing at the same time a “social” political vector (defense) mustazafov "," destitute "). It is quite natural that, with a hypothetical reconstruction of the USSR, radical conclusions should be drawn in this respect and radically destroyed the reasons that have already historically doomed the great nation to a state catastrophe. Issues of restitution of East Prussia should be inextricably linked with the territorial and strategic expansion of Russia, and Germany, in addition to maintaining Russian military bases in the Kaliningrad region, should, in turn, contribute to the diplomatic and political strengthening of Russia's strategic positions in the Northwest and West. axis. An attempt to follow such a Late Manomanian, "Slavophil" line in our conditions cannot but lead to a similar result. Since this seems unlikely, the Russians need to recognize, recognize and take on once again the complex role of the center of the Eurasian Empire. The European Empire, which is vitally interested in penetrating the south of the African continent as deeply as possible, must in the future fully control, relying on the Pan-Arab block, Africa right up to the Sahara, and in the future try to strategically infiltrate the entire African continent. The Eurasian project in no way leads to the leveling of nations, on the contrary, it proceeds from the need to preserve and develop the identity of peoples and cultures, but it is not about the irresponsible romantic dreams of "small nationalists" (which in practice lead only to chauvinism and suicidal ethnic conflicts), but about a serious and objective understanding of the current situation,where to achieve this goal is possible only under the condition of a radical undermining of the world influence of the atlantist West with its market, liberal ideology, claiming world domination. The traditional Atlantic policy in this region was based on Mackinder’s thesis about the need to create a “sanitary cordon” here, which would serve as a conflict buffer zone, preventing the possibility of a Russian-German alliance, which is vitally dangerous for the entire Atlantic bloc. Would it not be more correct to call this the creation of the "New Empire"? At each stage of the expansion of their state, the Russians went to the next stage of messianic universalism, first rallying the Eastern Slavs, then including the Turkic stream of the steppes and Siberia, then moving south into the deserts and mountains, and finally forming a gigantic political bloc controlling in the Soviet period, literally, half the world. His 1997 pivotal work, The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia, is a 600-page textbook that includes excerpts from some of history’s most prolific strategists. Iranian Islam is the best version of Islam for joining the continental bloc, and this version should be given priority but supported by Moscow. Chapter 1: The Definition of Geopolitics. In any case, the Franco-German Union is the main link of Eurasian geopolitics in the continental West, provided that the interests of Central Europe, namely its autarchy and geopolitical independence, are priority here. At the same time, the rather weak economic and technological development of this country does not allow fully relying on it, and therefore, the alliance will not solve any problems of the New Empire at this stage. It is unlikely that it will be possible to voluntarily reverse the civilizational path of this particular country, created in its time a gigantic trade-colonial empire of a purely "marine" type and so contributed to the emergence of the whole of modern Western civilization based on trade, quantity, capitalism, speculation and the stock market game. At the same time, of course, unlike the Atlantic Trilateral, the Eurasian Tripartite Commission should not have a Frenchman, but a German as the main representative of Europe. Its title is Foundations of Geopolitics – Geopolitical Future of Russia (we are using Serbian edition, Osnovi geopolitike – geopolitička budućnost Rusije. The Eurasian geopolitics of the New Empire is not just a geographic abstraction or an expression of a hypothetical will for unlimited expansion. It is obvious that the New Empire will not be either the Russian Empire or the Soviet Empire. In order for this action not to be perceived by the Russians as another step in geopolitical surrender, it makes sense for Europe to offer Russia other territorial annexations or other forms of expanding the strategic zone of influence, especially from among those states who stubbornly seek to enter the "Black Sea-Baltic Federation". Moreover, the “Atlantization” of modern China was much more successful than in Russia, since economic liberalism. But it should be especially emphasized that such an Empire can never become a continuation, development of a regional power or a nation-state, since such an intermediate stage will cause irreparable damage to the deep national imperial tendency, involve the Russian people in the labyrinth of insoluble geopolitical and social contradictions, and this, in in turn, it will make impossible a planned and consistent, logical imperial construction. This is the space of maximum civilizational activity and the source of all anti-traditional, "progressive" transformations. Alexander Dugin, The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia (Moscow: Arktogeia, 2000) Table of Contents: Foreword. ‘The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia’ is a 1997 geopolitical book by Aleksandr Dugin, a Russian political analyst and strategist known for his fascist views. In the book of American Serge Friedmann, "The Coming War with Japan" (the book is called "Coming war with Japan") seems inevitable. Pan-Arabism, preached by Syria, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, partly Egypt and Saudi Arabia (rather diverse and controversial projects in each case). This strategic aspect of the absence of such an exit from Russia was the main trump card of the atlantist geopolitics since the time of colonial England, which completely controlled Asia and the East, taking advantage of Russia's lack of direct access to the southern coast of the continent. This is the union of three geopolitical zones with a center in Russia, oriented against America. From the point of view of geopolitics, civilization and its specifics are generally strictly determined by geography and are subject to special qualitative laws with necessity. The rejection of the imperial-building function means the end of the existence of the Russian people as a historical reality, as a civilizational phenomenon. The Armenian question occupies an important place on the Moscow axis issue, as it traditionally serves as a center of destabilization in the Transcaucasus. The “nation-state" is based on administrative unity and bureaucratic centralism, which form the political community created by the state and closely connected with the state. This is the most significant point. Chapter 2: Tellurocracy and Thalassocracy . Empires were built immediately as an expression of a special civilizational will, as a super-goal, as a giant world-building impulse. There will never be such conditions for the creation of a great Russian Empire, if already now the people and political forces striving to speak on his behalf will not consciously and clearly affirm their fundamental state and geopolitical orientation. Being largely a national-communist de facto, it never transformed into such a de jure, which impeded the organic development of Russian-Soviet society, generated a double standard and ideological contradictions, and undermined clarity and awareness in the implementation of geopolitical and socio-political projects. In addition, the Kuril restitution cannot be carried out while maintaining the existing alignment of political forces in Russia and Japan. Such Russian "non-imperial" nationalism, secular and artificial, will play geopolitically only in the West’s hands, since it will secure a "regional" status for Russia, lead to illusory and short-term internal stabilization, and at the same time lay the foundation for future domestic Russian ethnic and religious conflicts. Russia, the Third Rome, both religiously, culturally, spatially, and strategically perfectly corresponds to a similar teleological view of the essence of history and clearly seeks to fulfill this very mission. In the meantime, US dominance continues, all intra-Eurasian conflicts and contradictions are. But if Turkey has two or three large ethnic communities, capable of actively opposing Young Turk centralism, hundreds of peoples live in the Russian Federation, perfectly coexisting in the imperial model, but not fit into the framework of "small Russian nationalism". Consequently, sooner or later, the limitations and inadequacy of such an ideologically contradictory design should have a negative effect. Its geopolitical future is mainly determined by the overall developments in that part of the world, which also includes Central Asian republics as well as Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova. Almost never did an ordinary state develop into an Empire. The Russians are the land, continental, North Eurasian people, and the cultural specificity of the nation is such that its “soul” is maximally predisposed to “openness”, to the implementation of the “integrating” function, to the subtle and deep process of developing a special continental, Eurasian community. All the blocks that will be part of the New Empire will be politically limited in one categorical ban on serving the Atlantic geopolitical interests, leaving the strategic alliance, and harming continental security. The European Empire without Moscow and, more broadly, Eurasia is not only unable to fully organize its strategic space with a shortage of military power, political initiative and natural resources, but also in a civilizational sense does not have clear ideals and guidelines, since the influence of the Trade System and market liberal values deeply paralyzed the foundations of the national worldview of the European peoples, undermined their historical organic value systems.The European Empire will become a full-fledged geopolitical and civilizational reality only under the influence of a new ideological, political and spiritual energy from the depths of the continent, i.e. This process cannot be attributed to the distant future, hoping for favorable conditions in the future. 2 The impact of this intended "Eurasianist" textbook on key elements among Russian elites testifies to the worrisome rise of fascist … However, in order for this to become a reality, and not just good wishes, it is necessary to ensure that it is geopolitics and its laws that become the main basis for the adoption of all significant foreign policy decisions in both Germany and Russia, since only from this point of view is necessity and inevitability the closest Russian-German union can be realized, understood and recognized totally and completely. The external pressure of the liberal-democratic West on the USSR was really enormous, and the activities of "subversive elements" inside the country were extremely effective and harmonious.
Honey Wish Promo Code, David Name Häufigkeit, Shopify Popup Code, Ich Bin Eine Wolke Zusammenfassung, Der Rosa Riese 2020, Giovanni Zarrella - Ciao Original, Peppa Wutz Kika, Uniklinik Freiburg Urologie Bewertung, Autoteil 11 Buchstaben, Susanne Wuest Kinder, Weihnachts Und Neujahrswünsche 2020 Bilder Kostenlos,